OP_RETURN
● #969,558
Other✓ CONFIRMED
From:satoshiSubject:Re: Dealing with SHA-256 CollisionsDate:June 14, 2010 at 20:39:50 UTCSHA-256 is very strong. It's not like the incremental step from MD5 to SHA1. It can last several decades unless there's some massive breakthrough attack.If SHA-256 became completely broken, I think we could come to some agreement about what the honest block chain was before the trouble started, lock that in and continue from there with a new hash function.If the hash breakdown came gradually, we could transition to a new hash in an orderly way. The software would be programmed to start using a new hash after a certain block number. Everyone would have to upgrade by that time. The software could save the new hash of all the old blocks to make sure a different block with the same old hash can't be used.
DECODED OP_RETURN OUTPUTS · 1
vout 0Message46726f6d3a7361746f7368695375626a6563743a52653a204465616c696e672077697468205348412d32353620436f6c6c6973696f6e73446174653a4a756e652031342c20323031302061742032303a33393a3530205554435348412d32353620697320…
0Open in chat room

Etched into the Bitcoin blockchain. It cannot be deleted, edited, or taken down.

ON-CHAIN RECORD
TXID
BLOCK#965,529 · 2026-09-04
FEE1 sat/vB · 1,780 sats ≈ $1.42
ADDRESS
SENDER
COLLECTION—
PROTOCOLtext
CATEGORYOther (AI)
SIZE804 bytes
TIME27d ago · 21:58 UTC
VIEW ON MEMPOOL.SPACE ↗